Our Medical Weight Management® Library (FAQ’S)
In order to have a successful aesthetic practice, you need to have effective advertising to attract people to your business.
This includes spending those
Last updated: September 2026
With advances in obesity and diabetes treatment, two medications — retatrutide and tirzepatide — sit at the front of the field. They belong to the same family of incretin-based drugs, but they are not at the same stage: tirzepatide is FDA-approved and prescribed every day, while retatrutide is still investigational. The retatrutide vs tirzepatide comparison has changed considerably in 2026, and this guide reflects where it stands as of September.
Three phase 3 retatrutide trials reported between December 2025 and July 2026, and a head-to-head trial comparing the two drugs directly is due to finish in December 2026. Below we compare how each one works, what the trials actually measured, how the side effects differ, and what each drug has proven beyond weight loss. If you are looking for dosing specifically, our retatrutide dosage guide covers the phase 3 step-up schedule in detail.
⚠ Safety Notice: Retatrutide is an investigational therapy in clinical development and is not FDA-approved for clinical use. Information on this page is provided for educational purposes for licensed healthcare professionals and should not be used as medical advice or as a basis for self-treatment. Products marketed online as retatrutide, including those labeled for “research use” or referred to informally as “reta,” are not verified for identity, strength, or sterility and may pose serious risks.
The honest answer, as of September 2026, is that nobody knows yet — and anyone who tells you otherwise is comparing two different trials. Both drugs are multi-action hormonal medications that target the pathways regulating blood glucose and body weight, but they have never been tested against each other in a published study.
What we can compare is what each drug did in its own pivotal obesity trial. On those numbers, retatrutide is ahead. In the 80-week TRIUMPH-1 trial, participants on the 12 mg dose lost an average of 28.3% of their body weight. In the 72-week SURMOUNT-1 trial, participants on the top 15 mg dose of tirzepatide lost 22.5%.
A phase 3 trial called TRIUMPH-5 is comparing retatrutide directly against tirzepatide in adults with obesity. It enrolled roughly 800 participants, its main measurement is the percentage of body weight lost at week 80, and it is double-blind, meaning neither participants nor investigators know which drug someone is receiving.
The trial began in November 2024 and is no longer recruiting. Its scheduled completion is December 2026, so results should become public in late 2026 or during 2027. That is the study that will settle the question this page asks, and it is worth watching for anyone advising patients on which direction the field is heading.
Weight-loss trials report two versions of the same result. One describes what happened to people who stayed on treatment as intended. The other describes what happened to everyone who was assigned the drug, including those who stopped early. The first number is always larger.
Most online comparisons quote retatrutide’s “stayed on treatment” figure against tirzepatide’s “everyone assigned” figure, which makes the gap look bigger than it is. Compared consistently, the difference is roughly 4 to 6 percentage points.
| Retatrutide 12 mg (TRIUMPH-1) | Tirzepatide 15 mg (SURMOUNT-1) | |
|---|---|---|
| Participants and length | 2,339 adults, 80 weeks | 2,539 adults, 72 weeks |
| Average loss, people who stayed on treatment | 28.3% (about 70 lb) | 22.5% (about 52 lb) |
| Average loss, everyone as assigned | 25.0% (about 62 lb) | 20.9% (about 48 lb) |
| Placebo, same two measures | 2.2% / 3.9% | 2.4% / 3.1% |
| Stopped because of side effects | 11.3% | 6.2% |
Both trials enrolled adults with obesity, or overweight plus a weight-related condition, without diabetes. Neither trial included the other drug. Sources: Eli Lilly and Company, May 21, 2026; June 4, 2022.
How to read any “X vs Y” weight-loss number: unless both figures come from the same trial, they are not a race result. Different participants, different starting weights, different trial lengths, and different definitions of “average” all move the number before either drug does.
The difference between these two medications is the number of hormone receptors each one activates. Tirzepatide is a dual agonist: it acts on the GIP and GLP-1 receptors, reducing appetite, slowing stomach emptying, and improving the body’s insulin response. Retatrutide does all of that and adds a third target, the glucagon receptor.
That third receptor is the entire reason retatrutide is a different kind of drug. Glucagon-receptor activation is thought to increase energy expenditure and mobilize fat stored in the liver, which is the leading explanation for the larger weight-loss figures seen in its trials. In a phase 2a liver study, 89% of participants on 8 mg and 93% on 12 mg reached a normal liver-fat level by 48 weeks.
| Tirzepatide | Retatrutide | |
|---|---|---|
| Receptors activated | GIP + GLP-1 (dual agonist) | GIP + GLP-1 + glucagon (triple agonist) |
| What that does | Reduces appetite, slows gastric emptying, improves insulin response | The same, plus a glucagon signal thought to raise energy expenditure and reduce liver fat |
| Brand names | Zepbound® (weight management), Mounjaro® (type 2 diabetes) | None — investigational, development code LY3437943 |
| How it is given | Once-weekly subcutaneous injection | Once-weekly subcutaneous injection (in trials) |
| What people call it online | “Tirz,” Zepbound®, Mounjaro® | “Reta,” and informally “GLP-3” |
A note on “GLP-3”: there is no drug class by that name. It is internet shorthand for a medication acting on three receptors instead of one or two.
Weight loss is the reason most people compare these two drugs, and both produce far more of it than earlier treatments did. The chart below lines up the doses studied in each drug’s pivotal obesity trial, using the same measure for both: average weight loss among people who stayed on treatment.
Average weight loss by dose, pivotal obesity trials
TRIUMPH-1 (retatrutide, 80 weeks) and SURMOUNT-1 (tirzepatide, 72 weeks), efficacy estimand. Separate trials with different participants; the doses are lined up for reference, not as a direct comparison.
Two details matter when quoting these figures. First, the headline number belongs to the top dose only — retatrutide’s lowest studied maintenance dose, 4 mg, landed between tirzepatide’s 5 mg and 10 mg results. Second, retatrutide’s highest doses carried the highest discontinuation rates, so the best-tolerated dose and the highest-loss dose are not always the same.
Depth of response is where the difference is clearest. In TRIUMPH-1, 45.3% of participants on 12 mg lost 30% or more of their body weight, a range previously associated with bariatric surgery, compared with 0.5% on placebo. Among 532 people who continued to 104 weeks, average loss reached about 30.3%.
Weight loss is consistently smaller when a patient has type 2 diabetes, and that holds for both drugs. Retatrutide averaged 20.8% at 12 mg over 80 weeks in the TRIUMPH-2 trial of participants with type 2 diabetes, compared with 28.3% in participants without it. Tirzepatide shows the same pattern across its own program, so this is a familiar counseling point rather than a surprise.
The figures many articles still quote come from retatrutide’s 48-week phase 2 obesity trial, published in the New England Journal of Medicine: average losses of 22.8% on 8 mg and 24.2% on 12 mg. Those results were what prompted the phase 3 program, which has now reported and supersedes them. Note that 8 mg was dropped in phase 3 in favor of 9 mg.
The safety stories are more similar than different. Both drugs are dominated by gastrointestinal effects that increase with dose and cluster during dose escalation, which is why both use a gradual step-up schedule. The ranges below cover all doses studied in each pivotal trial.
| Side effect | Retatrutide (TRIUMPH-1) | Tirzepatide (SURMOUNT-1) |
|---|---|---|
| Nausea | 28.6–42.4% | 24.6–33.3% |
| Diarrhea | 25.2–34.1% | 18.7–23.0% |
| Constipation | 23.8–26.1% | 11.7–17.1% |
| Vomiting | 10.6–25.3% | 8.3–12.2% |
| Dysesthesia | 5.1–12.5% (placebo 0.9%) | Not a reported signal |
| Stopped due to side effects | 4.1–11.3% | 4.3–7.1% |
Ranges across the doses studied: retatrutide 4, 9, and 12 mg; tirzepatide 5, 10, and 15 mg. Sources: Eli Lilly and Company, 2026 and 2022.
Dysesthesia means an unusual or unpleasant skin sensation — tingling, burning, or sensitivity to touch. It was not a prominent finding with tirzepatide or semaglutide, which makes it the most distinctive safety signal in the retatrutide program so far. Lilly reports these events were generally mild to moderate and that most resolved during treatment. Retatrutide’s phase 2 trial also showed a dose-related rise in heart rate.
Tirzepatide’s risks are characterized: large completed trials, years of real-world use, an FDA-approved label, and the class boxed warning regarding medullary thyroid carcinoma. Retatrutide’s profile is still being defined, and rarer or longer-term effects only become visible as a program completes. That asymmetry — known versus not yet known — is as important as any percentage on this page.
Average weight loss is one measure. What a drug has been shown to do for health outcomes is another, and here the picture reverses.
| Tirzepatide | Retatrutide | |
|---|---|---|
| FDA-approved uses | Type 2 diabetes (Mounjaro®, 2022), chronic weight management (Zepbound®, 2023), obstructive sleep apnea with obesity (2024) | None — investigational |
| Cardiovascular outcome data | SURPASS-CVOT: 13,165 patients, median 4 years. Non-inferior to dulaglutide for cardiovascular death, heart attack, or stroke (hazard ratio 0.92); superiority not met | TRIUMPH-3 recorded too few events to show a difference either way. A dedicated outcomes trial does not report until 2029 |
| Other trial findings | Established real-world safety record across millions of prescriptions | Knee osteoarthritis pain reduced about 75%, vs about 40% on placebo (TRIUMPH-4). Liver fat normalized in 89–93% of participants on 8–12 mg by 48 weeks (phase 2a) |
| Availability | Prescribable now; a monthly four-dose pen was approved in February 2026, and self-pay pricing through LillyDirect starts at $299 per month | Clinical trials or a narrow early access program only |
Sources: New England Journal of Medicine, December 2025; Eli Lilly and Company, 2025–2026; FDA approval records.
Many readers are really asking a three-way question, because semaglutide is the drug most patients started on. The progression is straightforward: one receptor, then two, then three.
| Semaglutide (Wegovy®, Ozempic®) | Tirzepatide (Zepbound®) | Retatrutide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Receptors | GLP-1 only | GIP + GLP-1 | GIP + GLP-1 + glucagon |
| FDA status | Approved | Approved | Not approved |
| Trial weight loss | About 15%; 20.7% with the higher-dose 7.2 mg version approved in March 2026 | About 21–22% at the top dose | About 25–28% at the top dose |
| Head-to-head evidence | Lost to tirzepatide in SURMOUNT-5: 13.7% vs 20.2% over 72 weeks | Beat semaglutide; now being tested against retatrutide in TRIUMPH-5 | No head-to-head result yet |
Figures come from separate trials except SURMOUNT-5, which compared tirzepatide and semaglutide directly. For a closer look at the two approved options, see our Zepbound® vs Wegovy® comparison.
The category moved in other ways in 2026 as well. A higher-dose semaglutide injection, Wegovy® HD (7.2 mg), was approved in March 2026 with 20.7% average weight loss over 72 weeks, and Foundayo™ (orforglipron), the first GLP-1 pill that can be taken without food or water restrictions, was approved in April 2026. Patients comparing options today have more approved choices than at any point in this drug class’s history.
This is the difference that matters most in practice today, and it is worth stating plainly.
There is no legitimate compounded version of retatrutide, because compounding pharmacies may not compound a drug the FDA has never approved. Any vial sold as retatrutide today is outside the regulated supply chain.
Patients are asking about retatrutide long before they can receive it, often while doing well on an approved medication. A consistent answer protects both the patient and the practice:
| Tirzepatide (approved label) | Retatrutide (trial protocol only) | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting dose | 2.5 mg once weekly | 2 mg once weekly in the phase 3 trials |
| Step-up interval | Every 4 weeks | Every 4 weeks |
| Maintenance doses | 5, 10, or 15 mg once weekly | 4, 9, or 12 mg once weekly in trials |
| Status of the schedule | FDA-approved prescribing information | A clinical trial protocol — there is no approved dose |
Retatrutide doses are shown for clinical context only. No dose of retatrutide is approved, and it should never be self-administered.
The clinical skills involved are the same in both columns: patient selection, gradual titration, side-effect management, and monitoring. A practice that runs semaglutide and tirzepatide well is already prepared for whatever is approved next. You can sample IAPAM’s clinical GLP-1 training with the free 1-CME module below.
Get self-paced access to a real IAPAM provider module covering GLP-1 and GIP receptor agonists, clinical protocols, and patient safety, and claim 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CME™ when you finish. It’s a free sample of our Certified Medical Weight Management Provider™ (CWMP™) program.
What’s Inside Your Free Module
Eligibility: MD/DO, NP, PA, RN
Enter your details and we’ll email your access link.
In their own trials retatrutide has produced larger average weight loss: 28.3% at 12 mg over 80 weeks in TRIUMPH-1, compared with 22.5% at 15 mg over 72 weeks for tirzepatide in SURMOUNT-1. Those are separate trials with different participants, so they are not a direct comparison. Tirzepatide is also approved, prescribable, and backed by cardiovascular outcome data, while retatrutide is investigational. “Better” depends on whether the question is average weight loss in a trial or a treatment a patient can actually receive today.
Not yet in published results. A phase 3 head-to-head trial called TRIUMPH-5 is comparing retatrutide directly against tirzepatide in about 800 adults with obesity, measuring percentage of body weight lost at week 80. It began in November 2024, is no longer recruiting, and is scheduled to complete in December 2026, so results are expected in late 2026 or 2027. Until then, every comparison between the two drugs is a comparison across separate trials.
No. As of September 2026 retatrutide is investigational and is not approved by the FDA for any use. Eli Lilly has said it plans to submit its application in the first quarter of 2027, and approval could only follow once the FDA completes its review. Tirzepatide, by contrast, is approved as Mounjaro® for type 2 diabetes and as Zepbound® for chronic weight management and obstructive sleep apnea.
“Reta” is shorthand for retatrutide, and “GLP-3” is an informal nickname that appears in online discussion. GLP-3 is not a real drug class and no medication is called GLP-3. The nickname comes from retatrutide acting on three receptors rather than one or two. The official development code is LY3437943.
Semaglutide, sold as Wegovy® and Ozempic®, acts on the GLP-1 receptor alone and produced about 15% average weight loss in its pivotal obesity trial, with the higher-dose 7.2 mg version approved in March 2026 reaching 20.7%. Tirzepatide adds the GIP receptor and beat semaglutide head-to-head in SURMOUNT-5, 20.2% against 13.7% over 72 weeks. Retatrutide adds a third receptor, glucagon, and has produced the largest trial figures so far, but it is not approved.
No. Retatrutide cannot be prescribed or dispensed because it is not approved. The only lawful routes are a clinical trial or Eli Lilly’s limited early access program for patients who cannot enroll in a trial. Stopping an effective approved medication while waiting for an unapproved one usually means regaining weight, and products sold online as “research use” retatrutide are unapproved drugs of unverified identity, strength, and sterility.
Both are dominated by gastrointestinal effects that rise with dose and cluster during escalation. In their pivotal trials, nausea was reported by 28.6% to 42.4% of retatrutide participants compared with 24.6% to 33.3% on tirzepatide, and 4.1% to 11.3% of retatrutide participants stopped because of side effects compared with 4.3% to 7.1% on tirzepatide. Retatrutide also showed dysesthesia, an unusual skin sensation such as tingling or burning, in 5.1% to 12.5% of participants, which was not a prominent finding with tirzepatide.
Tirzepatide is FDA-approved for weight loss under the brand name Zepbound®, while retatrutide remains investigational, with an FDA filing planned for the first quarter of 2027. On trial numbers the triple agonist is ahead: 28.3% average weight loss at 12 mg over 80 weeks, against 22.5% for tirzepatide at its top dose. On everything else — approved uses, cardiovascular outcome data, real-world safety experience, and the simple fact that a patient can start it tomorrow — tirzepatide is the one with the record.
The question this page asks gets a real answer when TRIUMPH-5, the head-to-head trial, completes in December 2026. Until then, the most useful preparation for any practice is fluency with the medications available now. IAPAM’s GLP-1 certification training for medical weight management providers covers semaglutide and tirzepatide protocols, patient selection, and long-term management, with up to 6 AMA PRA Category 1 CME credits online. Many providers pair it with IAPAM’s Botox® training to build a broader practice.
Explore GLP-1 Certification Training →
Safety Advisory: Retatrutide remains an investigational agent under study and is not approved by the FDA or other major regulatory authorities for clinical use. Products sold online as retatrutide or “research-only” retatrutide are not regulated or verified, and their contents, labeling, and sterility cannot be assured. Use outside authorized clinical trials is not supported, and patients should be directed to consult a licensed clinician for individualized care.
Disclaimer: The information provided here is for general knowledge only and should not be considered medical advice. For any questions or concerns about your health or medications, please consult your physician or healthcare provider. They are best equipped to provide guidance specific to your medical needs.
Medical Weight Management Training
Build the clinical, operational, and business foundations to evaluate GLP-1 weight-management services for your practice—without handing your patient relationships to a corporate intermediary.
Explore GLP-1 Certification Training →Want to add Botox® training to your broader practice plan? Explore IAPAM’s Botox training options →
Disclaimer: The information provided here is for general knowledge only and should not be considered medical advice. For any questions or concerns about your health or medications, please consult your physician or healthcare provider. They are best equipped to provide guidance specific to your medical needs.
In order to have a successful aesthetic practice, you need to have effective advertising to attract people to your business.
This includes spending those
While Ozempic® has been proven effective in clinical trials, a potential reason for not losing weight on Ozempic® is related to dietary and lifestyle choices.
Failure to refrigerate the Ozempic® within the correct temperature range may result in reduced effectiveness and potential harm to the user.
Learn about the effects of stopping Ozempic® for diabetes & weight loss. Manage withdrawal & maintain health gains.
Request your Quick Start Checklist for Starting or Integrating a New GLP-1 for Weight Loss Guide.
Terms and conditions apply. Offer expires September 30.